I recently went to a training program on leadership and we happened to discuss how organizations can learn from other industries other than their own and use what they learn to get creative with their own problem-solving endeavours. One of the examples that came up was how organizations could learn from the Army about motivating people. Though I appreciated the idea, I was under the impression that the Army would anyhow largely comprise motivated people. I wasn’t able to imagine people who were not passionate about protecting the country joining the Army – and I am talking about
I need some views on this topic. I mean, do let me know what you think.
2 comments:
Nimmy - Soldiers do not spend all their time in life or death situations. Friends of mine in the armed forces told me the most constant experience was one of boredom - the film "Jarhead" is accurate in this regard. I suspect the Indian Army is no different. It means a paycheck, you can hang out with the guys and hey - you get to carry a gun! Think of it as an extended arm of the civil service (without the strict literacy requirements).
The US armed forces have traditionally viewed their recruits as raw material to be moulded into something useful - to be enculturated. Hence they have spent a lot of money (probably more than another institution on the planet) examining how people learn. A suprising number of KM tools (such as AARs or Klein's work on decision-making) come from this source.
matt! thanks so much! i was, i am afraid, ignorant of some of the aspects you've shared! wow, if blogging leads me to continuous learning on these lines, i'd love it even more! :D please keep dropping your perspectives and views on my blog....really appreciate it! :)
Post a Comment