Internet and a Child's Brain

Google Vs Wikipedia

Bill talks about Google's potential decline in the wake of more sophisticated versions of Wikipedia. Being a big fan of Google, I am not sure I know how to respond, without getting a bit emotional. But then I am a fan of Wikipedia as well. :-) Coincidentally, the other day, when I was in a local KM community meeting, someone spoke about an article that apparently suggests that the birth of effective and meaningful social networking hints at the death of search. That was surely an Aa..ha! moment for me and I continue to entertain the idea. (After all, it is akin to organizational KM's shift from repositories to communities...isn't it?) Only time can tell how true this prediction is going to turn out to be. But here's some food for thought....whenever I want to learn about something brand new, I tend to visit the Wikipedia while I go to Google if I am looking for a specific article or ideas on something I am somewhat familiar with. Does this tell you something? And, btw, how do you choose between W and G?

Bill points to this elaborate article on Google Vs Wikipedia 3.0.

Update: Atul's interpretation of this post has made this debate/dialogue even more interesting. Go here to read his thoughts and my response to them.

Web 3.0

An excellent article that indicates what the future may be like - discovered by MT. Thanks for passing it on, MT! It quite answers my so-far unasked and latent question (er...maybe I did think aloud about this on Twitter?) on what things may be like a few years down the line. The article points to what the future of the Internet (and Intranets) is going to be like......how we are likely to discover information and knowledge as we ride the Internet and Web 2.0 wave. Doesn't come out of the blue...we all have heard before about intelligent searches and sophisticated collaboration mechanisms....but nothing like an article that pins it down to a few names and descriptions.

PS: I find the usage of the signal-to-noise metaphor - for describing the state of affairs on the WWW - to be appealing :-)

Newspaper on the PC...

Hadn’t come across this kind of a website earlier! It certainly would be a boon for people who find it difficult to get away from the conventional newspaper habit and are not so happy with online versions that contain pages that look like regular HTML pages. But this service, unfortunately, isn’t for free and seems to be targeted only at NRIs. :(

The Human Network-Post #2

As promised, here's the detailed post on The Human Network...

The Human Network is undoubtedly something very intriguing. Cisco is on to something for sure. It’s an admirable endeavour on their part to say the least. Ages ago people spoke about the world coming together. People spoke about the global village. The internet certainly has what it takes to create a global village and it is doing so in many ways. People are finding each other, helping each other, sharing with each other, working together….all through the internet. The Human Network and many other such initiatives are undoubtedly some things that will influence the future of the world. It therefore merits some retrospective reflection and analysis. I am no expert in the history of the collaborative online world. But I’ve attempted to randomly recall relevant developments and jot down what could have been the precursors and trend-setters of the collaborative online world.

Linus Torvalds created a revolution by getting passionate people across the globe to work together and share their work with a growing community. CKP in his book – The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value with Customers - spoke about a completely connected world in the context of commercial as well as the non-commercial ventures. Then came Blogs resulting in a situation that meant uninhibited self-expression that had the potential to influence the world. It also meant that one could keep in touch with thought-leaders and ordinary professionals alike and learn from and share with them as easily as speaking to one’s best friend – on almost a daily basis. Wikis went one step forward and allowed people to create something together. Wikipedia became an excellent knowledge repository that had answers to almost everything. Skype allowed people to get in touch through text and voice……for free. Regular Instant Messengers like yahoo, msn etc made it possible to chat with and leave messages for people in the opposite corner of the world. Google entered the arena of email, instant messaging, blogs, social networking et al and when Google enters something everybody looks up and the circle of influence undoubtedly widens. Flickr made it easy to collaborate on photographs. Social tools like LinkedIn, MySpace, Orkut attracted more users. Web 2.0 players like Delicious, Digg It, YouTube etc made it possible to share articles, posts, comments, and videos. There was almost nothing else that could not be shared on the World Wide Web.

Earlier attempts by a handful of companies to tap into collective intelligence to solve problems while adopting an innovative revenue-sharing mechanism evolved into Prediction Markets. Now, there is talk of social lending, collaborative books, social network analysis in organizations to enable effective collaboration etc.

Is all of this a clear case of United we stand, Divided we fall? Or is it the harbinger of absolute Mayhem on the World Wide Web? Who will organize everything? Is it ‘organize’able in the first place? If organizations don’t already have their own Internet Consultants, will there now be a new team of internet consultants in every organization, helping the latter to make sense of this absolutely amazing but chaotic World Wide Web?

What are the overall implications?

For organizations? I recently learned about the Second life initiative from a friend and colleague. So, will this be a perfect platform for finding a dream audience resulting in enviable revenue growth? The other implications related to employee-finding etc are obvious and can already be seen.

For politicians? Is it no longer going to be easy to fool the populace or take it for granted? CKP says “We are seeing the emergence of an economy of the people, by the people, for the people.” Now, is this the real democracy that we dream about?

For the media/news industry? Will they have to be really creative, quick, smart to be heard amongst the millions of genuine and closer-to-reality voices?

For People Technologies? There already is and will continue to be mind-blogging growth in day-to-day electronics that leverages on the internet. Such technologies are popular and will be increasingly ubiquitous and easy to own.

But I’d like to end with a googly. Will all this pull people apart as much as they try to bring them together? You don’t have to think hard to relate to what I said. How do you communicate with your friends, family and colleagues whom you can probably meet personally on a daily basis if you want to? Is it more on phone and emails, even if the person is sitting right next to your desk? How often have you seen people give incoming calls on the Mobile a higher priority over the person he/she is talking to in person….?

Related articles/References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_network?pcontent=hn_us&cat=Learn&pagename=Wikipedia

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_25/b3938601.htm

http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,38772,00.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_intelligence

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_networks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy

http://www.whatshouldireadnext.com/books/search

http://www.howwesee.com/ (Cisco’s website…)

http://www.thelivinglink.net/ - a collection of various resources

PS: Food for thought. All this inspires me to say that it certainly may take one person to start something…..but it becomes reality only when everyone joins in.

What next?

Google custom search! I am feeling quite dizzy catching up with so many ideas and so much of activity on the Internet....

Would it be smarter to wait for ideas to reach their tipping point and then join the bandwagon...with somewhat an assurance that the idea is one that is here to stay....?

Nah....the pleasure of getting to know what's happening to the world even as it happens is only next to being the very person who gives the world the idea...talking of which, I think it is all the more important for us (people not knowing where to look while something happens in every part of the Internet world) to take our breaks and let the ideas seep in or maybe just discard everything and think different...unbiased by the 'chaos' around one...